Compare

bughq vs Airbrake

Airbrake is one of the original error trackers, now a closed-source SaaS with error monitoring and light performance features. The capture-and-triage loop it made familiar is exactly what bughq provides, as an open project you can run on your own Postgres instead of a hosted-only account.

bughq and Airbrake, side by side

Capability
bughq
Airbrake
What it is
Focused error and crash tracking
Error and performance monitoring
Open source
Yes, open source
No
Self-host / data ownership
Yes, your own Postgres
No, SaaS only
Pricing model
Free self-hosted, usage-based hosted
Event-volume based
Error grouping
Automatic fingerprinting
Yes
Source maps and stack traces
Full source-mapped traces
Yes
Releases and environments
Built in
Yes, deploy tracking
Alerting
New and spiking issues
Yes
Data retention
Yours to set when self-hosted
Plan-based

Where Airbrake still leads: it is a long-established tool with deep, mature SDKs for Ruby and other classic server stacks.

Why teams pick bughq

01

Own your data

Airbrake is SaaS only. bughq self-hosts on your own Postgres, keeping error payloads on your infrastructure.

02

Open source

bughq is open and self-hostable, so ingestion and grouping are transparent rather than a hosted black box.

03

Predictable cost

Event-volume billing rises with incidents and traffic. Self-hosted bughq breaks that link and costs nothing to run yourself.

Credit where it is due

Airbrake has a long track record and battle-tested SDKs, especially in the Ruby world. bughq is the newer, open, self-hostable option covering the same essentials.

What bughq is

Open-source error and crash tracking you can run on your own Postgres, or use on a hosted tier. Automatic capture, fingerprint grouping, source-mapped traces, releases, and alerts, without the rest of an observability suite.

Own your error tracking.